After conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis of previously published randomized clinical trials, the authors found no statistically significant association observed with all-cause mortality (RR, 0.96; 95 percent CI, 0.91 to 1.02; risk reduction [RD] −0.004, 95 percent CI, −0.01 to 0.02), cardiac death (RR, 0.91; 95 percent CI, 0.85 to 0.98; RD, −0.01; 95 percent CI, −0.02 to 0.00), sudden death (RR, 0.87; 95 percent CI, 0.75 to 1.01; RD, −0.003; 95 percent CI, −0.012 to 0.006), myocardial infarction (RR, 0.89; 95 percent CI, 0.76 to 1.04; RD, −0.002; 95 percent CI, −0.007 to 0.002), and stroke (RR, 1.05; 95 percent CI, 0.93 to 1.18; RD, 0.001; 95 percent CI, −0.002 to 0.004). The authors note that current guidelines recommend use of omega-3 PUFAs through supplements or dietary counseling for patients after myocardial infarction. However, there is controversy about whether to use these agents for cardiovascular protection. The study results showed that "omega-3 PUFAs are not universally statistically significant associated with major cardiovascular outcomes across patient populations at increased cardiovascular risk." |
|